As technologies advance, do we humans also develop?

I believe technologies should be designed and used to support human development, including how we think, grow intellectually, and find joy in the process.

My research investigates human–information interaction in support of thinking and intellectual growth from a process-oriented perspective. Across my studies, I study how people generate ideas, develop epistemic interest and curiosity, and pursue their values through interactions with information systems and technologies, from libraries and mainly web-based information systems to artificial intelligence (AI). I also design and evaluate interactive information systems to better support these processes and make them more enjoyable.

Read more

Research Focus

I am currently exploring three aspects of human thinking that I believe deserve greater attention in the age of AI: creativity, curiosity, and cognitive effort. I find their relationship particularly interesting: creativity is about what emerges from thinking, curiosity drives us to keep seeking and questioning, and cognitive effort is the mental work we invest in the process, especially when thinking becomes difficult.

Creativity

How do people generate and develop ideas as they search for, evaluate, and organize information in web-based information systems?

How can AI-based systems be designed to support creative thinking and enhance creative outcomes?

Curiosity

How do epistemic interest and curiosity emerge, develop, and fade through interactions with information, particularly in conversations with AI?

How might reversing the conventional question-asking pattern, from “humans ask, AI answers” to “AI asks challenging questions, and humans respond and ask back,” influence people’s epistemic curiosity?

Cognitive Effort

What constitutes “desirable difficulty” in scientific research?

When does effortful thinking still matter, and how can we sustain it when working with agentic AI systems?

Currently, I am on the job market.

I’m eager to establish my own research lab, ÉTUDE Lab (Eudaimonic Information Interaction Lab), bringing together human–AI interaction and human development, with creativity, curiosity, intellectual joy, and intellectual virtues at its core. The name comes from the musical étude: a piece for practice and refinement that can also become a work in its own right. I hope our studies and experiments can do the same—test and develop ideas while contributing beyond the lab.

Throughout my academic journey, I have been fortunate to learn from and work closely with scholars whose work I deeply admire, particularly my committee members Drs. Soo Young Rieh (Chair), R. David Lankes, and Kenneth R. Fleischmann. Their scholarship and mentorship have helped me develop my own research agenda and grow as an independent researcher, and I now feel prepared to lead a research program of my own.

I plan to study how people and technologies influence one another over time, and to design and empirically study systems that support human thinking, learning, and development. I hope to join an academic community where my work can complement existing strengths and help open new directions for research, teaching, and collaboration.

Starting in Fall 2027, I’m ready to turn this vision into a research community of my own.

Click here to see my future research plans

What Drives My Research

With the arrival of the age of artificial intelligence, the human intelligence we once reached only through great effort has come within easy reach. Some now say that an intelligence greater than our own may one day replace us. In an age when intelligence becomes readily available and no longer scarce, where can we find the meaning of our existence as human beings? Artificial intelligence already performs tasks that we have long believed to require human intellectual ability, and its current technical limits may be overcome sooner than we expect. Then what should we think for, what should we achieve by ourselves, and what kind of life should we pursue? I believe this is one of the most fundamental questions we face today.

While we must respond to rapidly changing technology in a timely way, I believe we also need something timeless in our lives, something we can hold on to however the times may change. For me, that is philosophy. Philosophy does not remain in grand or abstract theory. Wherever we are and whatever life we live, it is the attitude of asking ourselves what we value, why we pursue it, and what consequences our choices bring. To keep asking these questions throughout our lives, we must be able to question again what we have taken for granted, examine the grounds that support our thoughts, and continually review and develop our thinking. If philosophy is asking about the direction of life, the power to think is what allows us to find that direction for ourselves and keep examining it.

Thinking rarely begins from nothing. We develop our thinking by encountering what already exists, understanding it, evaluating it, and connecting it to our own knowledge and experience. Sometimes we interpret the familiar in a new way, and sometimes we discover new possibilities between things that seem unrelated. Underlying this whole process is information interaction. Reading a book, searching for information on the web, talking with people, chatting with AI, and the many other experiences in our lives pass through different media, but they are all processes of forming thought through information. This is exactly the process I study: how information interaction is connected to human thinking, and how we can support this interaction for better thinking.

I hope that people can be fully equipped to use new technologies while keeping ownership of their own thinking. I hope that as the abilities of artificial intelligence advance, our own abilities advance as well, and that we do not stop at being satisfied with the results technology provides but pursue higher levels of achievement on our own. And above all, I hope that the very process of thinking, exploring, and achieving is itself a joyful process.

Let me return to the first question. In an age when intelligence becomes readily available and no longer scarce, where can we find the meaning of our existence as human beings? I want to search for the answer in what we ask, how we think, and what we choose to achieve by ourselves. As technology becomes more capable, I hope people can also think more deeply, explore further, and grow more richly. This is the future I wish to contribute to through my research.

Recent Updates

  1. I’m at the ASIS&T 2026 Annual Meeting! I’m excited to co-organize the SIG USE Symposium, Theories of Information Behavior 2.0, and to take part in the Doctoral Colloquium. I’m so looking forward to a full day of rich intellectual conversation!

  2. I’m delighted to have received a SIG USE Travel Grant. Thank you so much for the support!

  3. My proposal for the iSchool Research Grant was not selected this time. A little sad, but I’ll keep looking for another home for “Enacted Literacy,” one of my (near!) future research agendas.

  4. Our co-first-authored paper on scientific research, ideation, and intellectual ownership was desk-rejected by ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). Back to work to make it even crisper!

  5. I’m excited to share that my first-author paper, “Integrating Expertise in the Age of AI: College Students’ Views on Human and AI-Generated Reference Responses,” has been accepted to ASIS&T 2026! This work comes from the IMLS-funded LADDER project (Training Future Faculty in Library, AI, and Data-Driven Education and Research).

  6. I’m very happy to share that I successfully defended my dissertation proposal and am now officially ABD (All But Dissertation)! Heartfelt thanks to my committee members, Drs. Soo Young Rieh (Chair), R. David Lankes, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, and Jiqun Liu (external member). I am truly honored to have had their guidance throughout my entire program.

  7. I’m delighted to share that our co-authored paper, “Accountability, Transparency, and Trust in AI-Mediated Scientific Research,” has been accepted to the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT). Yay!

  8. I’m so honored that my first-author paper, “Interest-Driven Search in AI-Mediated Information Environments: An Audio Diary Study,” received the Best Short Paper Award at the 2026 ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR). This study was a joy to work on: it introduces the concept of interest-driven search, captured through audio diaries.

  9. Hello from Seattle, where I’m attending CHIIR 2026! The cherry blossoms here are absolutely stunning. I’m excited to present my short paper, get feedback on my dissertation research at the Doctoral Consortium, and connect with the wonderful CHIIR community.

  10. I’m excited and honored to have been selected for the highly competitive Outstanding Graduate Research Fellowship! It frees me from work duties in my final year so I can focus fully on my research, though I’ll miss teaching this year.